UPDATED AUGUST 6

Information is added to this page as the campaign progresses. Read this section for our latest news, and continue on for the backstory.

Members of the campaign met with Town Manager Curtis Yakimow on August 5, and it went well. The upshot: He will meet with the council and update us in a few weeks. There will be an agenda item on a September council meeting clarifying the town’s relationship to the chamber of commerce’s Grubstake Days, but that is not to be conflated with our proposed ordinance to prohibit tools and techniques used in rodeo events.

Curtis said the town is not interested in being involved in rodeo, but it is likely to award a special use permit for one should there be an appropriate application. He understands it is our goal to proactively prevent that. His job is to bring that to the council. The best outcome is they put the issue on the agenda, Curtis makes a staff presentation, there is council discussion and public comment, and the council takes a vote.

We were able to present our Proposed Ordinance – Prohibition on Rodeo Tools and Techniques and a one-page explainer called “Why Yucca Valley Need a Rodeo Tools and Techniques Ordinance” as well as full-color educational sheets on rodeo events and letters from veterinarians against the use of animals for sport and entertainment in rodeos. We were also able to discuss the tragedy that took place at the Salina rodeo on August 1.

As far as our pressure campaign, the best thing is to email, call or meet with council members. As long as the proposed ordinance prohibiting tools and techniques in rodeo events is not on the agenda, council by law cannot respond to your public comments or discuss the issue amongst themselves.

That said, you can continue to show up and speak in person or by Zoom. The next council meeting is August 18 at 5 p.m. The agenda and Zoom link will be posted here, usually by the Friday before the meeting: yuccavalleyca.portal.civicclerk.com

The proposed explainer and proposed ordinance are available for review below.

If you want to get involved or have suggestions, whether you are are near or far, please contact me at allie.irwin@gmail.com

----------------------------

Proposed Ordinance – Prohibition on Rodeo Tools and Techniques

Draft for Town of Yucca Valley Municipal Code, Title 10 – Animals

Prepared as a discussion draft for presentation to the Yucca Valley Town Council. This draft is a prohibition on the specific implements and techniques used in rodeo events, paired with explicit Council findings on the effect of that prohibition.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.03 TO TITLE 10 OF THE YUCCA VALLEY TOWN CODE, PROHIBITING THE USE OF CERTAIN DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES ON ANIMALS IN CONNECTION WITH RODEO EVENTS

WHEREAS, the Town Code currently contains no provision addressing the humane treatment of animals used in public exhibition or entertainment; and

WHEREAS, rodeo events commonly rely on the use of spurs, flank straps, ropes, prods, whips, and forcible manual takedown techniques applied to animals, each of which subjects the animal to a substantial risk of physical injury, fear, and suffering; and

WHEREAS, numerous California jurisdictions — including the Cities of Irvine, Pasadena, Chino Hills, and Laguna Woods, the County of Napa, and the City and County of San Francisco — have adopted ordinances prohibiting rodeos or rodeo practices within their jurisdictional boundaries; and

WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that prohibiting the use of these devices and techniques on animals within the Town of Yucca Valley is in the interest of animal and public welfare, and reduces the Town's exposure to liability associated with such events;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1.

Chapter 10.03 is hereby added to Title 10 of the Yucca Valley Town Code to read as follows:

CHAPTER 10.03 – PROHIBITED DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES IN RODEO EVENTS

SECTION: 10.03.010: Purpose 10.03.020: Definitions 10.03.030: Prohibited Conduct 10.03.040: Findings – Effect Of Prohibited Conduct On Specific Rodeo Events 10.03.050: Violations And Penalties

10.03.010: PURPOSE:

The purpose of this chapter is to prohibit the use of specific devices and techniques on animals in connection with rodeo events within the Town of Yucca Valley, in order to protect animals from practices likely to cause physical injury, torment, or suffering.

10.03.020: DEFINITIONS:

For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:

"Rodeo" or "rodeo-related event" means a public exhibition, performance, or competition featuring bareback bronc riding, saddle bronc riding, bull riding, calf roping, tie-down roping, team roping, steer roping, steer wrestling, barrel racing, mutton busting, or any similar event or activity involving the riding, roping, or physical taking-down of an animal for entertainment or competitive purposes.

"Spur" means any device, instrument, or attachment worn on or affixed to a rider's boot or footwear and designed or used to be pressed, dug, rolled, or otherwise applied against an animal's body to direct, urge, or provoke movement or behavior, regardless of the sharpness, dullness, fixed or rotating design, locking mechanism, or any sanctioning body's specification for such device.

"Flank strap" means any strap, rope, cord, or similar device placed around or across the flank, abdomen, or groin area of an animal and designed or used to encourage bucking, kicking, or other agitated movement, regardless of the material, padding, lining, or release mechanism used, and regardless of any sanctioning body's specification for such device.

"Rope" means any lariat, lasso, rope, or similar restraining or capturing device thrown, cast, or applied around any part of an animal's body, including the neck, legs, or horns, for the purpose of catching, restraining, throwing, or tying the animal, regardless of the rope's material, diameter, or breakaway design, and regardless of any sanctioning body's specification for such device.

"Prod" means any handheld or mechanical device, electric or otherwise, designed or used to strike, jab, shock, or apply force or stimulus to an animal's body for the purpose of directing, moving, or provoking the animal, regardless of voltage, current, or manner of contact, and regardless of any sanctioning body's specification for such device.

"Tool" includes any spur, flank strap, rope, or prod, as defined in this section, and also includes any part of a human competitor's body – including but not limited to the hands, arms, or full body weight – when used to grip, twist, torque, throw, or forcibly bring down an animal by its horns, neck, head, or any other body part, in connection with a rodeo or rodeo-related event.

10.03.030: PROHIBITED CONDUCT:

(a) No person shall use a spur, flank strap, rope, or prod, as defined in Section 10.03.020, on any animal in connection with a rodeo or rodeo-related event within the Town, regardless of whether the device is dulled, blunted, fleece-lined, breakaway, fitted with a quick-release mechanism, or is otherwise compliant with the equipment specifications of the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association or any other rodeo sanctioning body.

(b) No person shall use their hands, arms, or body weight to grip, twist, torque, throw, or forcibly bring an animal to the ground by its horns, neck, head, or any other body part, in connection with a rodeo or rodeo-related event within the Town, regardless of whether such technique is performed in a manner compliant with the specifications of the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association or any other rodeo sanctioning body.

(c) It shall be unlawful for any person to sponsor, conduct, or operate a rodeo or rodeo-related event within the Town in violation of subsections (a) or (b) of this section, or to permit such a violation to occur on property under that person's ownership or control.

(d) No person of any age or size shall climb on top of, ride, or attempt to ride sheep in connection with a rodeo or rodeo-related event.

10.03.040: FINDINGS — EFFECT OF PROHIBITED CONDUCT ON SPECIFIC RODEO EVENTS:

The Town Council finds that the tools and techniques prohibited by Section 10.03.030 are not incidental to rodeo events but are, in each case, defining elements of the events in which they are used. The Council sets forth the following findings as to the specific effect of this chapter on each event, and intends each stated effect:

(a) Bareback riding and saddle bronc riding. These events require both a flank strap, to induce and sustain bucking, and spur contact with the animal above the shoulder, as a condition of a qualifying score. The prohibitions on flank straps and spurs in Section 10.03.030(a) independently and jointly prevent these events from being conducted in a form that satisfies applicable scoring requirements. The Town Council intends that bareback riding and saddle bronc riding, as currently practiced, will not be conducted within the Town as a result of this chapter.

(b) Bull riding. This event requires a flank strap to induce and sustain bucking, and riders customarily wear and use spurs for grip and control during the ride. The prohibition on flank straps in Section 10.03.030(a) prevents the vigorous bucking on which scoring in this event depends, regardless of whether spurs are also used. The Town Council intends that bull riding, as currently practiced, will not be conducted within the Town as a result of this chapter.

(c) Calf roping (tie-down roping) and team roping. These events require the use of a rope to catch, restrain, or throw an animal as a defining element of the event. The prohibition on ropes in Section 10.03.030(a) prevents these events from being conducted within the Town. The Town Council intends this effect.

(d) Steer roping. This event similarly requires the use of a rope to catch and throw an animal. The prohibition on ropes in Section 10.03.030(a) prevents this event from being conducted within the Town. The Town Council intends this effect.

(e) Steer wrestling. This event requires a competitor to grip an animal by the horns and use bodily force and torque to bring the animal to the ground as the defining act of the event. The prohibition in Section 10.03.030(b) prevents this event from being conducted within the Town. The Town Council intends this effect.

(f) Mutton busting. This event consists of children climbing on top of, riding, or attempting to ride sheep for entertainment or sport. The prohibition in Section 10.03.030(d) directly prohibits this practice. The Town Council intends this effect.

(g) Chute handling and animal movement generally. Prods, as defined in Section 10.03.020, are commonly used across rodeo events to move animals into chutes, arenas, or holding pens. The prohibition on all types of prods in Section 10.03.030(a) applies to this handling regardless of the event for which the animal is being moved, and is not limited to any single event listed in this section.

10.03.050: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:

(Placeholder – Town Attorney to specify the applicable general penalty provision under the Town Code.)

----------------------------

WHY YUCCA VALLEY NEEDS A RODEO TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES ORDINANCE

One standard of care, applied consistently across every rodeo event and technique held on public or private property within the Town of Yucca Valley.

This page accompanies the attached draft ordinance and explains its reasoning, including its full effect. The ordinance prohibits the use of spurs, flank straps, ropes, and prods, and prohibits forcibly bringing an animal down by its horns or neck, in connection with rodeo events held in Yucca Valley. As the ordinance's own findings state, this means bareback riding, saddle bronc riding, bull riding, calf roping, team roping, steer roping, steer wrestling, and mutton busting could not continue in their current form. This page explains why that outcome is justified, and why it's reached this way rather than through a ban naming rodeo directly.

1. A Standard of Care, Not a Named Ban

Several California jurisdictions – San Francisco, Pasadena, Napa County, Irvine, Chino Hills, and Laguna Woods among them – already prohibit rodeo events outright by name. This ordinance takes a different route: it sets one animal-contact standard and applies it to every tool and technique used in these events, rather than naming and singling out the tradition itself. What happens to each event follows from whether that event depends on a prohibited tool, not from a Council judgment about the event's cultural value.

2. Why These Tools Can't Be Separated From These Events

Section 10.03.040 of the draft makes this explicit rather than leaving it implied. Bareback riding and saddle bronc riding score on spur contact and require a flank strap to sustain the bucking being judged. Bull riding depends on that same flank strap to produce the bucking its scoring is based on. Calf roping, team roping, and steer roping cannot function without a rope forcibly stopping and restraining a moving animal. Steer wrestling is, by definition, a competitor using his body weight to bring an animal down by the horns. In each case, the prohibited tool or technique is not a peripheral safety issue layered on top of the event; it is the mechanism that produces the event. Mutton busting is addressed directly rather than through a tool restriction, as a safety matter for the animal and the child. There is no version of any of these events that doesn't rely on the practice being prohibited.

Updated July 26 We received good coverage of the July 21 Yucca Valley Town Council meeting in the local media, including these stories by The Desert Trumpet and Z107.7 FM Joshua Tree. Stay tuned for next steps. If you want to get involved, send an email to allie.irwin@gmail.com. To see earlier campaign content, scroll down.

by Robert Haydon, online news editor, Z107.7 FM

Yucca Valley residents active on social media have probably seen the myriad of dueling posts about bringing a rodeo back to the town. At the June 16 Yucca Valley Town Council meeting, a small group of rodeo supporters used the meeting’s public comment period to discuss their wishes for the return of a rodeo, spurring online responses from residents who oppose rodeos to encourage more people to show up to the next meeting and voice their opinions, too.

Broadly, the argument for a rodeo says that the sport has a long tradition in the region, and that people that oppose it don’t understand the culture and history of ranching cattle work. Residents who oppose it say that using animals for entertainment or sport is cruel, and they don’t want town taxes to support a rodeo.

Of course, there are a wide range of opinions on the spectrum between those two stances, and anyone who witnessed the amount of heated discussion online may have been expecting the wild west at last Tuesday’s meeting of the Yucca Valley Town Council. There were about 60 people in attendance, and Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Schooler prefaced the discussion with a reminder that the rodeo isn’t on the agenda and as of right now, it doesn’t require any permission or action from the Town Council to move forward.

“We are happy to hear your comments, both pro and con, but we are unable by state law to take action or to comment on those items,” he said as the public comment period began.

The last time a rodeo was held in Yucca Valley was at the 2019 Grubstake Days celebration and took place next to Hawks Landing Golf Course. In 2018 it was held in Landers. The pandemic and other factors put a pause on the rodeo, and now Gina Pasquini wants to bring it back in 2027. She was the first to speak in front of the council and calls the rodeo her “brainchild and baby.” Pasquini says that she grew up in Yucca Valley and wants to see Grubstake Days return to how she remembers it growing up.

Gina Pasquini is heading up the efforts to bring a rodeo back to Yucca Valley.

“We can’t forget everything that we’ve done in our past. And I really do want to team with you guys. You represent the city. We’re the city. I want to work with you. So I’m just asking you to please possibly back me if you could put me on the agenda. We can work together. I would just love to see it come back in grandeur.” she told councilmembers.

Resident Sandra Hartness was next, saying that she’s lived here for 37 years and the rodeo used to be the center of Grubstake Days.

“It brings horse people together. There’s a lot of horses out here, and you just wouldn’t know anymore because there’s nothing for us to do.”

She also warned the Town Council that they would hear negativity about the rodeo that night, saying “you’ll probably have some real negative comments tonight about rodeo. So I’m for animal welfare, not for animal rights. And you have to understand that animal rights people are extreme, they’re extreme.”

Hartness told the council that animal rights activists have “poured bleach into fish tanks at Petco and shown up at dog shows and turned dogs loose, which in turn get hit by cars.” This spurred Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Schooler got on microphone and asked commenters to refrain from disparaging any other speakers in the room, which didn’t happen from members of either side for the rest of the comment period.

Resident Allie Irwin spoke next, and she also asked the council to consider putting the rodeo on a future agenda.

Allie Irwin addresses the Town Council over concerns over a possible rodeo return

“I’d like you to address town sponsorship, use of town property, and the event permitting process. Fighting over whether to have a rodeo isn’t a dispute where reasonable people can agree to disagree. And I don’t expect the council to settle that for me tonight. There are genuinely different beliefs in this room, but there is one group here with no voice and no vote.”

Irwin told the council that a rodeo ban reduces the town’s exposure to liability, code enforcement, animal control demands, and takes into account what she says is a small but substantial number of community members who believe that animals are exploited in rodeos. “What I’m asking is for the council to put a consideration of a municipal ordinance prohibiting rodeo events in Yucca Valley on an upcoming agenda. I’d like you to address town sponsorship, use of town property and the event permitting process.”

In total, there were 14 people who spoke on the rodeo, 10 in support and four in opposition. Those in favor of bringing back a rodeo pointed to the long tradition of Western heritage in Yucca Valley. Sisters Abby and Lucy Olea spoke to the bonds that they’ve formed with the animals that they care and work with.

Abby spoke first, saying “the purpose of rodeo is to celebrate Western heritage and transform essential ranching duty into competitive sports. More modern events such as bull riding and barrel racing test the speed and agility of the competitors while displaying the relationship between animal and human. Those who truly understand this sport know that it has never been about harm or exclusion.”

Her sister Lucy spoke next and shared her animal bona fides. “Though I have never been a rancher, I do have 13 chickens, two guinea fowl, two turkeys, four dogs, one lizard, and three beautiful horses. I would love to participate in rodeos right here in my own Western town.”

Discourse about the rodeo boosted attendance at the July 21 meeting

16-year-old Kaylin Moon is part of the California Junior Rodeo Association and says rodeo has always been a part of her life.

“Rodeo may be a rugged, tough sport, but it is not animal abuse. PRCA, Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association, has a rule book that is 250 pages long with extensive rules and regulations that protect the animals.”

Twentynine Palms resident Brenda Calvillo says that she doesn’t question the love and care that pro-rodeo people have for their animals, “but if we truly love the animals, would you put them in the way of danger? We don’t do that to those that we love. We don’t put them in unnecessary danger, and that’s what rodeos do. They put people, the public, and the animals in unnecessary danger. For what? For our entertainment,” she said.

She suggested a Western Heritage Festival that celebrates the history of the area without involving animals. Town council members didn’t have any specific comments after the public comment period at July 21st’s town council meeting. However, at June’s meeting, many shared fond memories of growing up in Yucca Valley and riding horses and attending the rodeo events.

The next Yucca Valley Town Council meeting is August 18, and the rodeo was not mentioned for consideration in future agenda items.

by The Desert Trumpet, written with assistance from the Yucca Valley Resident Review Committee

On a hot July evening, a rare summer audience turned out to educate the Yucca Valley Town Council about horses and rodeos, egged on by an equally heated Facebook thread.

The crowd did not come for the scheduled discussion items. The Council cleared its entire Consent Agenda in under fifteen minutes and moved through five department reports with little debate, but the rodeo that drew the crowd wasn’t up for a vote at all, and the Council was legally barred from acting on it or even responding. Of the roughly two hours and fifteen minutes the meeting ran, general public comment, always scheduled toward the end of business, took 50 minutes and the rodeo claimed most of it. Ten speakers urged Council to revive the Grubstake Days rodeo, while four were against.

Mayor Merl Abel was absent, excused; Mayor Pro Tem Jim Schooler chaired. The Yucca Room was half full; many of the folding seats taken, a few people standing at the back.

Public Comment: The rodeo arrives at Town Hall

The Grubstake Days rodeo dominated public comment at the June 16 meeting, when residents turned out to ask the Council to help revive the Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association (PRCA) rodeo that was once the celebration’s headline attraction. However, an opposing side showed up for public comment at this meeting: two speakers asked the Council to ban rodeos in Yucca Valley outright. Audience sentiment still tilted heavily toward revival with ten speakers urging the Council to bring the rodeo back while four were against.

Because the item was not on the agenda, Mayor Pro Tem Schooler reminded the room that the Council could listen but could not act or comment. Nothing was decided.

How the crowd got here

By the time of the July 21 meeting, the rodeo had already been argued by advocates for both sides for three weeks in the opinion pages of the Hi-Desert Star and across local Facebook groups. The print exchange ran as a back-and-forth: a July 1 letter to the editor by Allie Irwin of Joshua Tree, Rodeos are not a tradition worth restoring, urged the Council to ban rodeos; it was answered by a July 8 guest column by revival organizer Missy Buchanan, Rodeo celebrates values that shaped Yucca Valley; which them prompted a July 15 letter by Melissa Spurr, also of Joshua Tree, Suffering is built into rodeo events.

The debate spilled onto social media the same week. On July 15, Gina Pasquini, who led the call for revival at the June 16 meeting, posted in the Facebook group “What’s Going On in the Morongo Basin,” urging supporters to attend the July 21 Town Council meeting, while also branding those opposed as “a certain group that opposes western sports” who “don’t even reside in the Morongo Basin.”; on July 18, Buchanan posted a campaign update in a second group, “What’s Really Going On In The Morongo Basin,” announcing that “the countdown to Memorial Weekend 2027 has begun.” Between the print and online threads, the exchange drew hundreds of reactions and comments and turned, at times, personal.

In fact, the most visible opponents are Morongo Basin residents: Irwin and Spurr both live in Joshua Tree, and other speakers against the rodeo revival identified as Yucca Valley and Twentynine Palms residents. A speaker in favor mentioned being from Landers. Joshua Tree, Landers, Yucca Valley, and Twentynine Palms are all Morongo Basin communities. The “outsider” accusation draws a town-line boundary around an argument that appears to be Basin-wide on both sides.

In the meeting, Sandra Harkness’ characterization of the opposition was as extreme as she apparently believes the opposition to be:

…owning an animal, in their view, is slavery. This is the extreme people we’re dealing with. So when they get up here and talk, I’d like you to take them with a grain of salt because they’re based in emotion and not fact.

Mayor Pro Tem Schooler, in his role as acting Chair, eventually interrupted:

If we could refrain from disparaging any other speakers, everybody’s….

Harkness stopped Schooler, indicating she was speaking “in general.”

The revival case

In front of Council, Pasquini was upbeat, calling the rodeo effort “my brainchild…my baby.” She discussed working on rodeos elsewhere before returning to Yucca Valley where she was raised and asked that the Grubstakes rodeo be placed on a future agenda:

I miss Grubstakes Days. I saw Grubstakes Days in its grandeur. I was in the Grubstakes Days parade with my horse. I think by preserving our past, we strengthen our future. We can’t forget everything that we’ve done in our past, and I really do want to team with you guys. You represent the city. We’re the city. I want to work with you.

She was followed by longtime residents and a series of youth riders. The most detailed defense came from Kaylin Moon, 16, a former “Tiny Miss Grubstake Days Rodeo Queen” in 2017, whose Mom, “was a rodeo queen for Yucca Valley in 1996,” and aunt “was a rodeo princess in Yucca Valley in 1998.” A member of the California High School Rodeo Association, she argued the sport is closely regulated:

The PRCA has a rule book that is 250 pages long with extensive rules and regulations that protect the animals. I know from my own experiences that rodeo competitors and livestock contractors take amazing care of their animals. These animals are not only their livelihood and a huge investment, but are part of their family.

The youngest speaker, Lucy Olea, tied the sport to daily responsibility for the animals in her family’s care:

A rodeo is a competitive equestrian sport that displays the working skills of cowboys and cowgirls. Although I have never been a rancher. I do have 13 chickens, two guinea fowl, two turkeys, four dogs, one lizard, and three beautiful horses. I am responsible for feeding, mucking, and exercising our horses…

I don’t play soccer. I don’t play pickleball. I ride horses.

The ban case

Allie Irwin asked the Council to do something concrete: sponsor a future agenda item to consider a municipal ordinance:

…what I’m asking is for the Council to put a consideration of a municipal ordinance prohibiting rodeo events in Yucca Valley on an upcoming agenda. I’d like you to address town sponsorship, use of town property, and the event permitting process. Fighting over whether to have a rodeo isn’t a dispute where reasonable people can agree to disagree, and I don’t expect the Council to settle that for me tonight. There are genuinely different beliefs in this room, but there is one group here with no voice and no vote.

Irwin added that taking this move aligns Yucca Valley:

with a documented trend among California municipalities, reduces the town’s exposure to liability, code enforcement, animal control demands, and takes into account the desires of a minority but a substantial number of community members who believe that animals are exploited in rodeos.

Brenda Calvillo of Twentynine Palms also called for a ban and noted that the past need not determine the future:

Communities evolve. We can honor our Western heritage without using animals in competitive events. Respecting tradition and showing compassion are not mutually exclusive. They can go hand in hand. Yucca Valley has the opportunity to create events that celebrate our unique community without putting animals at risk. Imagine a Western heritage festival with live country music, line dancing, cowboy poetry, historical reenactments, local artisans, blacksmith demonstrations, delicious food vendors and performances that focus incredible skills without involving animals.

Tell Yucca Valley that you won't support cruelty

SAMPLE LETTER TO TOWN COUNCIL

mabel@yucca-valley.org, jschooler@yucca-valley.org, rdenison@yucca-valley.org, jdrozd@yucca-valley.org, rlombardo@yucca-valley.org, townclerk@yucca-valley.org


Subject: Future agenda item request for rodeo ban

Dear Mayor Abel, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Schooler, Council Member Rick Dennison, Council Member Jeff Drozd, Council Member Robert Lombardo and Town Clerk Brook Dudra,


I'm writing to introduce a topic that I hope the Town Council will consider for a future meeting agenda: whether Yucca Valley should adopt a municipal ordinance prohibiting rodeo events within town limits.

The topic: Several California cities and counties have already adopted such ordinances, including Pasadena, Irvine, Chino Hills, and Laguna Woods, which ban rodeos outright, as well as San Francisco and Napa County. Los Angeles's City Council is currently working on a rodeo ban. This is a live, active area of municipal policy in California, not a fringe position.


Please consider directing staff to research a comparable ordinance for Yucca Valley by reviewing how neighboring jurisdictions have structured their bans, what enforcement looks like, and what legal or fiscal considerations apply here.

The benefit:

  • Positions the town proactively, ahead of any future rodeo proposal, rather than responding case-by-case to individual event applications.

  • Aligns Yucca Valley with a documented trend among California municipalities.

  • Reduces the town's exposure to the liability, code enforcement, and animal control demands that rodeo events can generate.

  • Takes into account the desires of a minority but substantial number of community members who believe animals are exploited in rodeos.


Will one of you please raise this topic during the "Future Agenda Items" portion of tomorrow’s meeting?

I will provide public comment, which is essentially this:


The rodeo committee that requested town funding during public comment at your last meeting has since split from the Chamber of Commerce and is forming its own nonprofit. It no longer appears to be seeking town funding or sponsorship.

That shift doesn't resolve the underlying question. I'm asking the council to proactively agendize consideration of a municipal ordinance prohibiting rodeo events in Yucca Valley – addressing town sponsorship, use of town property, and the event permitting process. Several California cities, including Pasadena, Irvine, Chino Hills, and Laguna Woods, have already adopted comparable bans. I'm asking that staff be directed to research this option under Future Agenda Items.

There is one group in this conversation that actually has no voice and no vote.

Respectfully,

(your name here)

Updated July 20: Since we began organizing against the rodeo, the rodeo committee has split from the chamber of commerce and is forming its own nonprofit. They no longer appear to be seeking town funding. That's a step in the right direction, but it doesn't resolve the underlying question. We're now asking the town council to create an ordinance that bans rodeos in Yucca Valley for good. The first step is getting the topic on an upcoming agenda. The next council meeting is July 21. In advance, you may wish to email the council and request that the rodeo ban be put on an upcoming agenda. Your public comments requesting this and sharing your opinions against the rodeo are still needed.

The addresses are here: mabel@yucca-valley.org, jschooler@yucca-valley.org, rdenison@yucca-valley.org, jdrozd@yucca-valley.org, rlombardo@yucca-valley.org, townclerk@yucca-valley.org

The agenda is here: www.yucca-valley.org/i-want-to/find/meeting-and-agendas

The Zoom link to attend and comment virtually is here: https://zoom.us/j/98109341005?pwd=82T8M0xraLiiy1RTYNN49SJt2Ur7e1.1

Below are my latest thoughts, a new sample email, a couple letters to the editor published in the Hi-Desert Star and a new Change.org petition:

Trying to override social consensus is a bitch.

What happens on an issue when “agree to disagree” isn’t possible?

In the case of the rodeo in Yucca Valley, I’m saying that an animal is being harmed, and the animal has no vote in the negotiation. I’m being asked to accept that the harm doesn't count, or that it counts less than someone's right to do it. Those aren't equally weighted positions being traded off; one side has a claim to non-negotiability that the other doesn't.

I've been told to simply not attend the rodeo if I don't like it. To go back to LA, which I never came from. To go fuck myself. Yeah, that's not gonna happen.

But what is the moral philosophy that underlies activism boundaries and intervention ethics?

The best I can come up with is that the capacity to suffer is universal; therefore, moral duties transcend local traditions. I don’t grant moral immunity to power, history or the majority. Animals have an inherent right not to be treated as property or resources. Because rodeos commodify animals for entertainment, the entire institution is structurally unjust. Intervention is a duty to disrupt an ongoing rights violation.

Civil disobedience, or at least civil participation, is obligatory.

The group working to bring rodeos back to the Morongo Basin has broken with the Yucca Valley Chamber of Commerce, its former sponsor. Last month they requested support from the city council, and they are now forming a nonprofit organization to host annual rodeos.

In defense of the animals, I am asking the town council to proactively prohibit rodeos within their jurisdiction, so that a special use permit for a rodeo within town limits would not be granted. I’ve set out the arguments for this in previous posts.


The city council meeting is Tuesday. The rodeo is not on the agenda, but I will be requesting they add it to an upcoming meeting. The agenda is here: www.yucca-valley.org/i-want-to/find/meeting-and-agendas, and the Zoom link is here:

https://zoom.us/j/98109341005?pwd=82T8M0xraLiiy1RTYNN49SJt2Ur7e1.1


Majority preference has power, but when what’s popular and what’s right aren’t the same thing, showing up is the only honest response. And I sure would love some backup.


Petition: https://c.org/TKv5yHVSvt

more information at rodeofacts.org

Letters to the editor

HERE'S HOW YOU CAN HELP

*Note the date change, as YVTC cancelled its July 7 meeting

Stay connected, be ready for next steps

Send me your email if you'd like updates on further actions!

Give public comment on July 21

The Town Council meets at 5 pm on Tuesday, July 21, in the Yucca Room at the Yucca Valley Community Center, 57090 Twentynine Palms Hwy, Yucca Valley, CA 92284

When you arrive, sign up to speak during public comment, which is held at the end of the meeting for non-agenda items. You will have three minutes to address the council and audience, and your statement becomes public record. You can also bring signs or posters. We can sit together in a strong showing of solidarity. You can also give public comment over Zoom. When the link is published, a few days before the meeting, it will be here: yuccavalleyca.portal.civicclerk.com

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear Mayor Abel (District 3), Mayor Pro Tem Jim Schooler (District 1), Council Member Rick Dennison (District 5), Council Member Jeff Drozd (District 2), Council Member Robert Lombardo (District 4) and Town Clerk Brook Dudra,


Please do not help to reinstate the Grubstake Days rodeo.

Many residents of Yucca Valley (and beyond) have evolved to realize that just because something has been a long-held cultural tradition doesn’t mean it is still relevant or even acceptable. Many traditions have been retired for good; ending slavery, granting women the right to vote, accepting gay marriage, for example. The same is true in the realm of animal rights.

Every animal advocacy organization rebukes rodeos on the grounds that animals used in rodeos are sentient beings who feel pain. They are individuals who have the right to live without human exploitation for sport, entertainment or financial gain.

Cows and horses are prey animals. Rodeo events subject them to intense fear and abuse. Who of you sees compassion in forcing a 3 month old calf who is still nursing to run in sheer terror for his life by chasing him on horseback at 30 miles an hour, lassoing his neck, slamming him to the ground, flipping him on his back and tying three of his legs together?

Who of you sees compassion in bouncing around on the spine of a bull, a horse, a sheep even. Kicking them with spurs no matter how dull, cinching them with straps no matter how padded. Prodding them with electric rods no matter how weak. This is a matter of riding on the power of others, and we don’t need it.

Yucca Valley can join several California municipalities that have already said no to inflicting violent trauma, injury and extreme distress on rodeo animals, and teaching children that this archaic tradition should continue.

San Bernardino has no ban or restrictions on rodeos. This is Yucca Valley’s opportunity to lead the way. We pride ourselves on – and rely on tourism dollars from – our unique placement within the natural world and our appreciation of wildlife. We’ve recently made big efforts to support domesticated animals at our shelter. The abuse of rodeo animals does not align with our values.

The Yucca Valley Chamber of Commerce says they lack the funds to host the rodeo for the 2027 Grubstake Days celebration, and their rodeo committee on June 16 asked for the town’s support. I urge you to reject any proposals to fund, subsidize or host a rodeo. Forcing Yucca Valley taxpayers to contribute to an activity rooted in animal exploitation is deeply unjust.

Ultimately, please use your leadership to ban rodeos in Yucca Valley for good.

With compassion,

(your name)

(your town)

Send an email to the council

Send your comments in writing. Address to all five council members and the town clerk. There is a sample letter below that you can copy or personalize, and the email addresses are here: mabel@yucca-valley.org, jschooler@yucca-valley.org, rdenison@yucca-valley.org, jdrozd@yucca-valley.org, rlombardo@yucca-valley.org, townclerk@yucca-valley.org

Tell Yucca Valley that you won't support cruelty

Rodeo fans want to bring the event back for Grubstake Days 2027, and they've asked the Town Council to fund a rodeo with taxpayer money. We're asking the council to reject that proposal and go further: Ban rodeos in Yucca Valley for good.

NOTE: This section was published June 28